Forum topic: Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
PGC Webmaster
23 May 2021 00:44 #5992
- PGC Webmaster
- Topic starter
Share Share by email
Intervention by police officers last Wednesday prevented opponents of the Fox Lane low-traffic neighbourhood (LTN) from mounting a protest deliberatedly timed so that it presented a danger to children returning home from school during National Walk to School Week.
Winchmore Hill police intervened between 3pm and 4pm on 19th May when a number of motorists arrived with the intention of driving repeatedly through a camera-controlled road closure point as a gesture of protest against the Fox Lane LTN scheme. The protest had been organised on social media by Paul Mandel, a leading opponent of the LTN, who deliberately chose the time when children would be returning home from school. Deterred by the presence of three police officers, who had been alerted by the Better Streets for Enfield campaign, drivers who had arrived to participate departed. Paul Mandel afterwards used social media to disparage Better Streets and claim that police time had been wasted.
Paul Mandel in his Facebook post announcing the planned protest argued that, on a technicality (a typo), the prohibition on vehicles driving into or out of Conway Road at the Fox Lane junction is invalid and also inferred that the council has introduced the prohibition in order to raise revenue from fines on drivers who ignore it:
THE TRAFFIC ORDER APPEARS TO BE INVALID. THE CASH COW AT THE TOO OF CONWAY ROAD IS ADJACENT TO 111 FOX LANE, NOT 11 FOX LANE. I PLAN TO DRIVE TROUGH THE CONWAY ROAD(CLOSURE) POINT REPEATEDLY BETWEEN 3 and 4 PM today. ALL WELCOME TO JOIN, IN THEIR CARS OR JUST CHEERING FROM THE SIDELINES. TIME CHOSEN TO COINCIDE WITH SCHOOL RUN.
COUNCIL MUST REFUND EVERYONE IT HAS FLEECED.
After police had dispersed the protest and spoken to Paul Mandel, he posted a tweet accusing Better Streets for Enfield of being "curtain twitchers" and suggesting that they should be prosecuted for wasting police time.
We had a nice friendly chat didn’t we AR. Agreed on a lot and discussed the unenforceable “modal” filter. No danger was caused to anyone . Perhaps the Bitter Streets curtain twitchers should be prosecuted for wasting police time.
— Paul Mandel (@paul_mandel) May 20, 2021
On the PGC forums Andy Barker, a past chair of the Fox Lane & District Residents' Association (FLDRA), has pointed out that the planned protest would have occurred during National Walk to School Week, when more children than ever would be walking or riding bikes back from school. He has also queried the failure of the current FLDRA committee to denounce the planned protest.
Forum comment by Andy Barker
The past week has been 'National Walk to School Week', when more child11ren than ever have been seen walking and/or cycling to school.
On Wednesday the 19th a member of the One Community faction posted the following (of which this is a verbatim extract): “THE TRAFFIC ORDER APPEARS TO BE INVALID. THE CASH COW AT THE TOO OF CONWAY ROAD IS ADJACENT TO 111 FOX LANE, NOT 11 FOX LANE. I PLAN TO DRIVE THROUGH THE CONWAY ROAD (CLOSURE) POINT REPEATEDLY BETWEEN 3 AND 4PM today. ALL WELCOME TO JOIN, IN THEIR CARS OR JUST CHEERING FROM THE SIDELINES. TIME CHOSEN TO COINCIDE WITH SCHOOL RUN.”
This is one of the most thoughtless and boneheadedly stupid ideas so far from the anti-LTN faction. I understand that the Head Teacher of St Monicas had to send out an urgent message to warn parents of the proposal, and that the Police were eventually involved.
Do I take it that the anti's have now decided to move away from mere vitriol and vandalism towards the much more dangerous scenario of targeting children?
As of yet, I have seen no denouncements or apologies for the proposed actions from anyone, including the Residents' Association .
A sorry state of affairs indeed.
(Originally posted to the forums at 11.08 am on 22nd May 2021.)
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
PGC Webmaster
23 May 2021 01:03 #5993
- PGC Webmaster
- Topic starter
Share Share by email
Though it's possible that technically he could not have been fined for driving through the prohibition, the intention of the traffic order is absolutely clear, as are the signs prohibiting cars from passing, and he understands them perfectly.
The point about the cameras being a "cash cow" is clearly deceitful. Paul Mandel is intelligent enough to know full well that the council's intention is not to collect fines but to deter people from driving past the signs in order to stop traffic cutting through the area. What is more distressing is that at least one councillor has made the same point and they too know full well what the intention of the cameras is and are being deliberately deceitful, something which is incompatible with the duties of a councillor. The same deceitful allegation has been made repeatedly on another local community website, which is disgraceful.
There are legitimate arguments against the Fox Lane LTN as well as legitimate arguments for it and individuals are entitled to reach their own conclusions as to which outweigh the other. However, it is never legitimate to incite or participate in potentially dangerous breaches of traffic law or to use deceitful arguments.
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Adrian Day
23 May 2021 10:14 #5994
- Adrian Day
Share Share by email
And the comment about 'curtain twitchers' is laughable - Mandel put the post on Enfield Voices - a publicly visible facebook group with over 3000 members. It's disappointing inflammatory posts are allowed in the first place (a fair few people engaged with it) - although thankfully it was removed quickly after I reported it.
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Adrian Day
23 May 2021 10:20 #5995
- Adrian Day
Share Share by email
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Emma Maloney
23 May 2021 10:47 #5996
- Emma Maloney
Share Share by email
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Karl Brown
24 May 2021 08:37 #5997
- Karl Brown
Share Share by email
1. Those in the convoy before dispersing come forward and explain themselves;
2. The officers of the One Community organisation explain itself;
3. Andy Barker, a widely respected decade long chair of the residents association, implies a tainting from its current action / inaction. A clarifying response is needed for members asap
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Philip Sheffield
24 May 2021 11:09 #5998
- Philip Sheffield
Share Share by email
Police intervene as anti-LTN campaigner incites dangerous lawbreaking
Neil Littman
27 May 2021 09:03 #6007
- Neil Littman
Share Share by email