Forum topic: New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Basil Clarke
09 Jul 2020 18:21 5417
- Basil Clarke
- Topic starter
Share Share by email
Enfield Council's revised plans for the Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood, which were published today, will dramatically reduce traffic and associated pollution, noise and road danger over a large area of residential streets stretching from Palmers Green to Southgate. Subject to approval by the deputy council leader, the proposals will be implemented on a trial basis for six months starting this summer.
The trial will also serve as a 6-month formal consultation period, during which the council will also carry out monitoring of the effect on roads outside the area. Depending on the results of both, the scheme will either be discontinued, modified or made permanent.
Leaflets showing the new scheme were today distributed to homes in the neighbourhood, and more detailed information has been uploaded to the Let's Talk Enfield website, along with an explanatory video.
Compared with the controversial proposals that were published last year, the new scheme has far fewer "modal filters" (ie obstacles to prevent cars driving through) and they will be mostly located at the Fox Lane end of roads coming off Aldermans Hill. Many drivers will thus have more direct routes to their destinations in the area. Gates near the railway bridge in Fox Lane and near the junction of Meadway and Bourne Avenue will allow through emergency services and waste collection vehicles, while preventing access by other vehicles..
Dramatically reduced traffic in the area
By preventing drivers from cutting through the area, the scheme will lead to falls in traffic of 75 per cent or more in the busiest streets, such as Meadway, Amberley Road, Greenway and Old Park Road, while Fox Lane itself could experience a reduction of 90 per cent or more.
Table: Estimated effect of scheme on traffic flows*
(If the table is not displaying properly, click here)
Existing (2019 survey) | Estimated post-scheme | % reduction | |||||||
7AM-7PM | AM Peak Hour | PM Peak Hour | 7AM-7PM | AM Peak Hour | PM Peak Hour | 7AM-7PM | AM Peak Hour | PM Peak Hour | |
Bourne Avenue (N) | 1600-1700 | 200-300 | 100-200 | 500-600 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 65-75% | 85-95% | 80-90% |
Parkway | 200-300 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 100-200 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 35-45% | No change | No change |
The Ridgeway | 100-200 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 100-200 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 0-10% | No change | No change |
Greenway | 2000-3000 | 200-300 | 200-300 | 500-600 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 75-85% | 85-95% | 85-95% |
Fox Lane (W) | 5000-6000 | 500-600 | 500-600 | 700-800 | 200-300 | 200-300 | 80-90% | 55-65% | 50-60% |
Amberley Read | 3000-4000 | 300-400 | 300-400 | 600-700 | 100-200 | 50-100 | 75-85% | 50-60% | 75-85% |
St George's Road | 1100-1200 | 100-200 | 100-200 | 300-400 | 100-200 | 100-200 | 65-75% | No change | No change |
Craniey Gardens | 500-600 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 15-25% | 60-70% | 60-70% |
Burford Gardens | 600-700 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 500-600 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 10-20% | 60-70% | 60-70% |
Caversham Avenue | 800-900 | 100-200 | 50-100 | 400-500 | 50-100 | 0-50 | 45-55% | 45-55% | 60-70% |
Fox Lane (E) | 5000-6000 | 600-700 | 500-600 | 500-600 | 100-200 | 100-200 | 85-95% | 85-95% | 85-95% |
Devonshire Road | 600-700 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 300-400 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 40-50% | 60-70% | 60-70% |
Old Park Road | 1700-1800 | 200-300 | 50-100 | 400-500 | 100-200 | 0-50 | 70-80% | 35-55% | 60-70% |
Groveland Road | 1100-1200 | 100-200 | 100-200 | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 55-65% | 45-55% | 80-90% |
Lakeside Road | 500-600 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 15-25% | 60-70% | 60-70% |
Denvent Road | 600-700 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 400-500 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 25-35% | No change | No change |
Ulleswater Road | 600-700 | 50-100 | 50-100 | 500-600 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 10-20% | 60-70% | 60-70% |
Conway Road | 600-700 | 100-200 | 0-50 | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 25-35% | 80-90% | No change |
Selborne Road | 1600-1700 | 100-200 | 100-200 | 500-600 | 100-200 | 50-100 | 65-75% | No change | 45-55% |
The Mall | 2000-3000 | 300-400 | 300-400 | 600-700 | 100-200 | 0-50 | 70-80% | 50-60% | 85-95% |
Oakfield Road | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 400-500 | 0-50 | 0-50 | 0-10% | No change | No change |
Meadway (S) | 3000-4000 | 500-600 | 400-500 | 300-400 | 50-100 | 100-200 | 85-75% | 65-75% | 35-45% |
*The numbers shown in the table indicate the total number of vehicles on the road - both with a local origin or destination, and traffic cutting through the area
Impact on surrounding roads
While estimating the effect on traffic volumes within the area is relatively easy, forecasting what will happen on surrounding roads is much less straightforward. There is ample evidence of "traffic evaporation" following the introduction of low-traffic neighbourhoods elsewhere. This reflects the fact that traffic is not an uncontrollable elemental force of nature, it is the result of human behaviour, and schemes such as this are designed to change behaviour, to encourage less driving and more active travel - walking, riding bikes, using public transport - and to move longer distance travel back to the strategic roads where it belongs and which it would have used before satnav made it easy for drivers to navigate complex routes designed to shave a small amount of time off their journeys, to the detriment of people living along the routes.
With streets inside the area being quieter and safer, and with cleaner air, some residents will walk to destinations outside the area when they previously would have driven, thus removing traffic. Some of the drivers that currently cut through the area will use completely different routes that may not go anywhere near Palmers Green or Southgate. Given time, new patterns of travel will emerge. There's no reliable way of forecasting what they will be - a sufficiently long trial is the most effective way to find out.
Next steps
Council officers are currently drafting a formal report that sets out the details of the design, including all the previous engagement and feedback received. This report will then be submitted to the deputy council leader, Ian Barnes, who is the primary decision maker for this neighbourhood project.
Subject to formal approval a trial of this design will commence over the summer. Any trial would take place using a process of experimental traffic orders. It is at the point of the start of a trial where formal consultation opens for a period of six months, with residents able to provide comments once they have had the opportunity to experience the trial working in practice. At the end of the 6-month review period, a decision will be made on whether to remove the trial, make changes or make the project permanent. This decision will be informed by the community feedback collected throughout the consultation during the trial period.
Once the formal report has been approved, it will be published on the project page. The council will then send a letter to all properties within the area to inform people of the decision.
If the trial is going ahead, this letter will provide more information on specific timelines and further detail on how additional feedback can be provided as part of the formal consultation process.
To find out more visit: letstalk.enfeld.gov.uk/foxlaneQN
Links
Let's Talk Enfield: Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Darren McCarthy
09 Jul 2020 19:58 5418
- Darren McCarthy
Share Share by email
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Adrian Day
09 Jul 2020 20:48 5419
- Adrian Day
Share Share by email
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Alex Lyness
10 Jul 2020 20:26 5420
- Alex Lyness
Share Share by email
I live on Aldermans Hill and this scheme is a disaster for the residents on the surrounding roads. It is pushing all the traffic onto the outer roads and there is no mention of improving the safety of these roads. The junction of Aldermans Hill and Cannon Hill is a notorious blackspot yet nothing has been done to it in 10 years. This whole scheme is a snobbish attempt to push unwanted traffic into other areas. It has to go somewhere. You are going to have countless delivery vans doing U-turns on the blocked up roads and the roads are not wide enough if cars are parked everywhere. The consultation shows most residents are against this. Is there some sort of protest group acting against this scheme or a judicial review in progress?
Agreed the surrounding roads need measures as well but the council have to start somewhere.
On the u-turn point. Thames water recently closed our road at one end for a few days. All the delivery vans and trucks managed fine with u-turns and there was no traffic apocalypse on our street that I could see. Given lockdown has increased delivery vans/trucks this suggests they’ll manage just fine. A trial will help surface any issues.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Adrian Day
11 Jul 2020 10:08 5421
- Adrian Day
Share Share by email
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Karl Brown
12 Jul 2020 11:30 5423
- Karl Brown
Share Share by email
I don’t buy the argument that the traffic, “has to go somewhere”. The same is often used regarding waste. Both start from the premise that it’s there to begin with; that is where the real aspect of choice lies.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Neil Littman
16 Jul 2020 08:54 5430
- Neil Littman
Share Share by email
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
New plans for Fox Lane quieter neighbourhood revealed
Simon Broughton
16 Jul 2020 09:13 5431
- Simon Broughton
Share Share by email
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.