Forum topic: Borough's community newspaper among news providers threatened by lockdown
Borough's community newspaper among news providers threatened by lockdown
PGC Webmaster
07 Apr 2020 22:28 #5310
- PGC Webmaster
- Topic starter
Share Share by email
The financial security of the borough's community newspaper, Enfield Dispatch, is being seriously undermined by the Covid crisis and, like independent news providers across the country, and the social enterprise (Socent) sector more generally, it is falling between the cracks in the government schemes designed to support business during the lockdown.
Despite this, publisher Social Spider CIC says it is committed to continuing to print 10,000 copies a month and will not be "furloughing" the news teams that produce the Dispatch and three sister papers. Social Spider is backing a call for emergency government funding for the independent news sector.
"Local news matters now more than ever"
Despite the loss of most of its distribution points throughout the borough, there was a full print run for the April issue of Enfield Dispatch, described by editor James Cracknell as its most important edition to date, and volunteers were used to carry out door-to-door deliveries. James has tweeted that "local news matters now more than ever" and has suggested that readers who pick up the paper from its regular newstands outside stations should take a few extra copies and put them through neighbours' letterboxes.
"The government is happy to pay £55,468 for our team to do nothing, but is offering £0 to support us to provide news..."
The absurd situation in which the Dispatch's publisher finds itself has been explained by Social Spider boss David Floyd in a series of tweets:
So latest news on what the government is doing for our #socent - because we rent an office from a charity, we are not registered for business rates so ineligible for the £10,000 grants that are otherwise available to all businesses our size.
— David Floyd (@davidsocialsp) April 6, 2020
Our decision to continue publish our newspapers rather seek government funding to pay our community news team not to publish them will cost us £9244 per month. Over a 6-month period, the government is happy to pay £55468 for our team to do nothing but is offering £0 .. — David Floyd (@davidsocialsp) April 6, 2020
... to support us to provide news for local people - & to amplify the voices of our local communities. I understand ministers are working hard in an extremely tough situation -I'd be grateful if you could add your voices to those calling for this approach to be amended! #socent
— David Floyd (@davidsocialsp) April 6, 2020
Call for emergency funding for the independent news sector
Enfield Dispatch editor James Cracknell has joined local news providers across the country, both print and online, in calling for government support to keep them afloat during the coronavirus crisis.
"If we don’t want large swathes of the country to become news deserts for the first time since the Enlightenment then the UK government must act now to support the on-the-ground newsgatherers whose work the rest of the industry is largely based on."https://t.co/HpcRhgwO4S
— James Cracknell (@JollyJourno) April 4, 2020
An open letter from the Independent Community News Network (ICNN) says that without emergency funding communities across the UK will lose their independent press at a time when they need it most, emphasizing the important role that these publications provide, giving "essential, verified and useful information to the communities they serve."
Both the mainstream press, whose members are represented by the News Media Association (NMA), and ICNN's 108 member news organisations, are facing a collapse in advertising revenue, particularly sharp in the case of advertising by local firms. ICNN's members could be out of business in the course of a few weeks. The NMA has been lobbying government to supports its members by diverting key public information messages to its members. ICNN says that when doing so the government must not ignore the independent media, which also play key roles:
"Many of our members are the only news publishers in their areas, some covering entire counties and cities. If these publishers are forced to close, the UK will be left with many more news black holes which we will struggle to fill again. We have stats that prove, even in areas with lots of local press, some of our members have the most engaged audiences."
Unfortunately, few independent media outlets fall into the small business category and thus qualify for government coronavirus support. Most are sole traders, for whom there is no support scheme as yet. The cost of keeping these essential news outlets afloat would be low:
"We cannot stress enough how a little funding will go a very long way with our members. The amount is very small – we are basically talking about covering individual salaries in some cases, to keep an entire publication going. None of the money will go to shareholders or to cover large overheads."
In Enfield James Cracknell has been seeking backing from the borough's three MPs, and yesterday Edmonton MP Kate Osamor tweeted in support.
Local paper's like @EnfieldDispatch are not being supported by the Government during this #COVID19 crisis. The Government needs to take action now to save local newspapers that shine a light on local issues and help our democracy. #saveindependentnews
— Kate Osamor MP for Edmonton || (@KateOsamor) April 7, 2020
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Borough's community newspaper among news providers threatened by lockdown
PGC Webmaster
12 Apr 2020 00:49 #5311
- PGC Webmaster
- Topic starter
Share Share by email
Given the estimates that charities are set to lose at least £4 billion in income during the first 12 weeks of the Covid lockdown, the £350 million allocated to small community charities (around 150,000 of them even if social enterprises are not included) seems a long way off what’s needed.
The money is nowhere near enough for the small community charities – it would be amazing if it helped one in five of those that need it – and it ignores many larger charities (supporting millions of vulnerable people) entirely.
It also stacks up particularly badly against the £585 million worth of business rates relief given to a single supermarket group (Tesco), who are about to pay £635 million in dividends to shareholders.
Alongside this relatively paltry provision, the Chancellor has declined to make amendments that would enable charities and social enterprises who have lost income but still have similar (or increased) demand for their services to take advantage of his (generally very good) ‘furlough’ scheme to support workers.
His article is entitled " 5 things we learnt when voluntary sector leaders asked the government for a funding deal to support charities and social enterprises through Covid – and what happened next didn’t blow our minds ".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.