pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
facebook icon twitter icon

Forum topic: Talking trash: What do residents think about more and better recycling?

 

Talking trash: What do residents think about more and better recycling?

Basil Clarke

10 Mar 2022 00:27 6404

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Share by email

[Original article]

lets talk rubbishA new survey of north London residents, launched this week, is asking us about how waste is collected from our homes, how well we think the current system works, our ideas for improvements, and what changes we would find acceptable if they meant that more of the items we no longer need could be recycled instead of being burnt.

Let's Talk Rubbish - the North London Zero Waste Survey is being carried out both online and also door-to-door, to ensure that everyone has a chance to contribute. It's being organised by a group of people from the seven boroughs whose waste is sent to be burnt in the Edmonton Incinerator. These are Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey, Islington and Waltham Forest.

The seven boroughs have all failed dismally in meeting targets for increasing the proportion of household waste that is recycled. Currently far too much - around 70 per cent - is burnt in the incinerator. But, scandalously, something like 80 per cent of the materials that are burnt are potentially recyclable.

Haringey resident Sydney Charles, one of the organisers of the survey, is unhappy about the attitude of the seven councils:

"Our councils only see a future where we keep burning more and more rubbish, so we launched this survey to ask if people in north London would prefer to rapidly improve kerbside recycling, sort valuable recyclables from kerbside rubbish and cut down on burning."

The survey results will be collected before the council elections on 5th May and provide a public mandate for the next generation of councillors, including the councillors sitting on the board of the North London Waste Authority (NLWA).

The campaign has been prompted by the recent conclusion of a contract for construction of a new and larger incinerator in Edmonton. The board of the NLWA turned a deaf ear to strong arguments that building the new plant is a seriously misguided decision, for environmental, economic and other reasons.

Dr Rembrandt Koppelaar, a resident of Hackney, comments: "Our councils are planning with this new incinerator to continue burning the majority of our rubbish for the next 30 years, despite the possibilities of collection service improvements and recycling technology to turn most of our rubbish into recycled materials."

Part of the NLWA's remit is to encourage recycling. In response to criticism from campaigners about its failure to do so effectively, the waste authority has repeatedly asked the campaigners for ideas. Vicki Pite, a former Labour councillor from Enfield, explains that the survey is an answer to this request: "We are responding by not only proposing what can be done, we are also asking residents what solutions they would welcome, to make sure people’s voices are being heard across north London".

So what's wrong with burning our waste?

artists impression of the planned new edmonton incineratorArtist's impression of the planned new Edmonton Incinerator

It must be better than dumping it in landfill? The incinerator generates electricity and heat for district heating - surely that's good? If it wasn't, surely the North London Waste Authority wouldn't be building a new and larger incinerator to replace the current facility, which is fifty years old?

It's true that some benefit is being obtained from the waste in the form of heat and power, but those benefits are greatly outweighed by a whole list of problems caused by incineration.

To list just the most important:

  • incinerators create a "plume" of polluted air that travels over neighbouring areas - where exactly depends on wind direction at the time, but Edmonton is surrounded by built-up areas in all directions.
  • while the new incinerator will be "cleaner" and better at filtering out particulate matter from the smoke coming out of the chimney, it simply isn't possible to remove the very smallest particulates and these are the ones that penetrate most easily into our internal organs, including the lungs, heart and brain.
  • burning plastic creates a particularly toxic type of pollutant - dioxins.
  • quite apart from the threats to health from burning plastic, it's tremendously wasteful because plastics are made from non-renewable fossil fuels, mainly oil. They are precious materials that should be reused, not destroyed.
  • there are plenty of other materials that are being burnt that could be recycled - metal, glass, paper, cardboard, to name but a few.
  • last, but certainly not least, incinerators emit huge quantities of carbon dioxide, the main "greenhouse gas" that is driving changes to the Earth's climate and posing a threat to future life on earth. In 1970, when the existing incinerator was built, very few people were aware of this threat. In 2022 everyone knows and the most important challenge facing governments and local government is to bring these emissions down to almost zero as quickly as possible.

But recycling everything that can be recycled would still leave us with a residue of material that can't be reused, won't it? True, but there are ways of stopping that sort of waste being created in the first place - mainly through big reductions in the amount of unnecessary packaging, using recyclable packaging and, of course, ensuring that the products inside the packaging can be repaired and, when the time comes, themselves be recycled. The goal must be a truly circular economy where nothing is thrown away or destroyed.

Incineration is yesterday's technology. Today's technology can separate out recyclables even from general "black bag" rubbish

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

 

Talking trash: What do residents think about more and better recycling?

PGC Webmaster

16 Mar 2022 18:20 6405

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Share by email



A reminder that this survey continues until the end of the month. Please let the campaigners have your opinions on how recycling of waste is currently done, how it could be improved and what you think about building a new greenhouse-gas emitting incinerator.

Let's Talk Rubbish - the north London zero waste survey

The story of Rubbish, Recycling and Reuse in North London. How to supercharge change

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: PGC WebmasterBasil Clarke
Time to create page: 0.728 seconds
Powered by Kunena

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Clicky