Comment

Share share on facebook share on twitter share on Bluesky

'Micromobility bays' are currently being installed on some streets in the south of Enfield borough, but have met with some opposition. What exactly are they and what are they intended to do?

micromobility bay in warwick road n11 1A newly installed micromobility bay in Warwick Road, which can hold up to 12 bikes and takes up the same amount of kerb space as a single car. This is one of the Enfield streets south of the North Circular that will be included in Haringey Council’s trial of dockless rental e-bikes

If you live in or visit parts of the London Borough of Enfield that are located inside the area bounded by the North Circular Road - New Southgate, Bowes, parts of Palmers Green and Upper Edmonton - you may have noticed small areas of some streets that have been penned off with metal railings. These are "micromobility bays", and their purpose is to help people switch from cars to more environmentally friendly forms of personal transport - e-bikes and, eventually, e-scooters (it remains illegal to ride e-scooters in Enfield, but it's likely that their use will soon be legalised throughout the country).

The bays are being installed in connection with an 18-month trial of dockless e-bikes in our neighbouring borough, Haringey. Rather than expecting bike users to know exactly where Haringey ends and Enfield begins, the sensible decision has been taken to extend the area in which the bikes can be used as far as the North Circular, which forms a much more obvious boundary.

The ten streets where bays are being installed are Warwick Road, Evesham Road and Russell Road in New Southgate ward; Princes Avenue, Pasteur Gardens and Lister Gardens in Bowes ward; and Wilbury Way, Ladysmith Road, Leyburn Road and Somerset Road in Upper Edmonton ward.

The bikes used during the trial are owned by two companies, Lime and Forest, and are "dockless", as opposed to the Santander-branded "Boris Bikes" that have been around longer and have to be collected from and returned to special docks. Dockless bikes too are hired by the hour, but unlike Boris Bikes they can be picked up and left anywhere. This final point is proving both a blessing and a curse.

A blessing because they make it easier and much less expensive to make rental bikes available in more places. This enables more people to use this inexpensive and flexible but low-impact way of travelling. "Low-impact" in that cycling does not create anything remotely like the amount of air pollution (not just from exhausts - microscopic tyre debris too is a serious health hazard), noise pollution, congestion or danger that driving does, and - most important of all - is not a source of climate-changing greenhouse gas emissions.

A curse because rental bikes left carelessly on pavements are an impediment to pedestrians and a hazard in particular for blind or partially sighted people. They're left on pavements sometimes because the riders are inconsiderate, but often because there is nowhere else near their destination to leave them.

This is where micromobility bays come in. If councils and bike hire companies can between them create a sufficiently dense network of bays for people to pick up and leave rental bikes, then it will be possible to bring in tougher measures to stop people leaving them on pavements. There are proposals to make it an offence to leave a rental bike on the pavement if there is a micromobility bay within 100 metres.

On some streets where there are parking restrictions the council is required to consult residents before going ahead with installation of the bays. One such street is Princes Avenue, which runs east from Green Lanes, south of the North Circular. Princes Avenue resident Steven Murdoch, who runs a physiotherapy clinic from his home, has objected, arguing that neither he nor any of his immediate neighbours own a bicycle and have not seen evidence of any demand for public bike storage on a quiet residential street:

"We, and our neighbours have written to the council suggesting it may make more sense to have these bays next to a station, bus stop, school or busy junction.

"If they absolutely see a need for a micromobility bay close by, we've said it would be much better suited away from the entrances to residential properties."

To my mind, this rather misses the point. If I were a driver visiting someone in Princes Avenue, I wouldn't want to park at the nearest station, bus stop, school or busy junction, I'd want to park near my destination, so why should it be any different for a cyclist?

And the micromobility bays aren't intended for people who have their own bikes. Not everyone who would like to use bikes from time to time wants to own one, or it may simply be impractical in an area where access to homes is through the front door only. A micromobility hub gives local residents an opportunity to use a bike when the wish or need arises, and makes it easier for others to cycle when visiting addresses in the street. It widens people's choices.

Micromobility: the wider context

My thoughts above relate specifically to the arrival of Lime and Forest hire e-bikes in Haringey and the southernmost parts of Enfield. But in the last week or so there have been important developments on a London-wide and countrywide scale regarding the importance of increasing active travel (walking, cycling and "wheeling") and of both harnessing the benefits of dockless hire bikes and reducing their negative impacts.

The first was this year's annual report, Health in Cities, issued by the UK's Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty, which emphasizes the importance of active travel for improving the nation's health. One of its subchapters (4.7) is devoted to the subject of active travel in cities.

Here are a few excerpts where the point is made strongly - I could have quoted several more:

"Cities should be ideal places for enabling active travel with shorter distances to the things we need or want on a regular basis, including supermarkets, places of leisure, work or healthcare. Making walking and cycling more practical and safer, and access to green space easier and more equitable, would go a long way toward removing barriers to improving physical activity levels and could significantly improve the health of England’s increasingly urban population."

"As the health, economic, environmental and social benefits of active travel to the quality of life in our cities have become more widely recognised, there have been increased programmes, pilots and initiatives trialled in UK schools, workplaces, communities and health and care settings. Overall, multicomponent interventions including environmental or infrastructural changes have been shown to have the highest impact on active travel levels, with those covering larger areas having most impact. Interventions that offer bikes (especially e-bikes and adapted bikes) are also effective and can make active travel accessible to more people, including those on low incomes70 or with health/mobility issues. Future investment in active travel interventions should use this evidence and not invest in short-term behavioural only interventions."

"We need to give equal weight to all the travel and transport needs of all our city dwellers. Changing the environment changes behaviour, so city planners need to reallocate road space away from cars and towards other more efficient and less polluting forms of transport. The negative impact of car dependency on physical and mental health, air pollution, road traffic danger, inequalities, carbon emissions and productivity must be clearly communicated to the public, with open discussions on what alternative systems could look like and the benefits these will bring."

Turning specifically to dockless hire bikes and micromobility hubs, it's clear that the local scheme discussed above is just a small part of something much bigger. Transport for London (TfL) has announced that it is funding the installation of 800 new micromobility hub spaces on roads that it controls and a further 7,500 on roads controlled by borough councils.

However, the issue of hire bikes cluttering pavements is also very much in the sights of TfL and of London Boroughs, the umbrella organisation that speaks on behalf of all boroughs.

A government white paper on devolution recently published paves the way for organisations like TfL to impose a London-wide system of regulation, stating “Local transport authorities will be empowered to regulate on-street micromobility schemes (like hire bikes), so local areas can shape these schemes around their needs, connect people to public transport, and tackle the scourge of badly parked cycles and e-cycles.”

However, it will take time for new legislation to come into force, while TfL and the boroughs are in a hurry to rectify the situation, as is clear from the following press release:

"We need action on responsible micromobility parking now" - London Councils responds to Government announcement of new powers for transport authorities

Following the announcement of new micromobility powers for transport authorities in the English Devolution White Paper, Cllr Kieron Williams, London Councils Executive Member for Climate, Transport and Environment, said: 

“We have seen the great benefits dockless e-bikes and rental e-scooters provide to people travelling across the capital, but we are also aware of the challenges this new transport option has brought to London.

"While the large majority of people using the bikes do so with care and respect for their fellow residents, we are still seeing far too many blocking pavements, roads and crossings. This is putting other people’s safety and accessibility at risk, especially elderly and disabled Londoners.

"We welcome today's announcement from Government to issue transport authorities with new powers to set consistent rules across areas using dockless e-bikes and rental e-scooters.

“But we need action on responsible parking in London now. I have written to Lime and Forest today alongside the Walking and Cycling Commissioner, setting out our concerns and asking them to work with us to tackle poor parking and the excess amount of dockless e-bikes.

"Dockless e-bikes and rental e-scooters are a major positive step forwards for London, but to work for our city they need to work for all Londoners. London boroughs will continue to work with TfL, operators, and users to make sure they do.”

Source: Press release issued on 16 December 2024

You can read a mobile-friendly version of the letter to the bike hire firms below or download a copy in PDF format.

 

 

Links

E-bike hire scheme extended into Enfield borough (Enfield Dispatch 13 December 2024)

TfL spends £1million on parking bays for e-bikes (as thousands more hire bikes due to arrive in London) (The Standard 26 November 2024)

 

Log in to comment