News, comment and features

How a mammoths's tooth helped save the museum and local studies centre

The name "Enfield 229" comes from the reference number of one of the oldest objects in the museum's collection:  Bd.229 - a 10,000 year old mammoth's tooth found in 1909 and displayed in Southgate Town Hall from 1914.  It was so popular that it inspired the creation of the borough's first museum.

The campaign, during 2015, was launched in response to a proposal by the council to take away the exhibition space on the ground floor of the Dugdale Centre and make access to the local studies centre and archives by appointment only.

A significant difference between the 2015 proposals and the bigger changes currently planned for the Dugdale Centre was that in 2015 the council ran a consultation with an online questionnaire. Currently, the council has given no clues whatever about its plans for the museum and archives.

The proposals and the eventual decisions were discussed by the council's overview and scrutiny committee in November 2015.

Is the headline used by Enfield 229 in 2015 just as relevant in 2020? Let's hope not, but it would certainly help to have some reassurance from the council.

A request from the Enfield Society

We are asking our members and the general public to write to the Leader of Enfield Council (Cllr Nesil Caliskan, ), local councillors, the Chief Exec (Ian Davis, ) and the Director of Property (Mark Bradbury, ) asking the Council to consult with us over plans for the Museum, Local Studies Library and Archive.

At the end of June we wrote to the Leader but as of Friday 10th July have not had a reply. That letter has now been sent to all Councillors and the Chief Exec. Please send us a copy of any e-mail you send. You can reach us at .

Please consider using some of these points when writing to the Council:

• Where is the Local Studies Library and Archive going to move to? Will it be accessible by public transport and accessible by those with disabilities?
• During the move of the museum and archive they will be closed and inaccessible to the public.
• Fragile museum objects and archival material could be damaged when moved threatening their stability and integrity.
• There will be costs associated with employing a specialist removal firm to move the collections.
• What will happen to the temporary exhibition space on the ground floor? This space is vital for a changing exhibition programme as it ensures items from the museum’s stores are seen by members of the public.
• What will happen to the permanent exhibition space which showcases the history of the borough and used by school visits?
• When are we going to be consulted on these changes?
• Moving the museum could lead to loss of accreditation from the Arts Council (the Museum of Enfield is the only accredited museum in the borough), and for movement of the archive loss of accredited status with The National Archive.
• Loss of accreditation will mean that the Museum and Archive are not eligible for grants from the National Lottery Heritage Fund, NLHF, and other bodies such as the London Museum Development team at the Museum of London.
• The move of the archive and the museum will affect the ability to meet the ambitious but very commendable and worthwhile Heritage Strategy published by the Council in 2019 and the draft Local Plan.
• The move of the archive from a central location will mean it is more difficult to address the report of the Enfield Town Consultative Group with its emphasis on heritage in Enfield Town.
• Considerable costs were incurred by the council when the Local Studies Library and archive were moved from Palmers Green Library in 2008 providing reinforced floors for the purpose-built roller racking for the collections and air conditioning of 16-18c to comply with British Standard 5454.
• The Museum’s permanent displays on the first floor—the Enfield Life Gallery and People and Places Picture gallery—were created on the first floor in 2012 with show cases containing bandit proof glass and high quality Abloy locks, also at substantial cost.
• The council recently spent considerable amounts of public money refurbishing Charles Babbage House for Children and Youth Services which will now be sold off.
• Why did the Council fail to inform affected staff at the Dugdale Centre when it announced the move by e-mail to the rest of Council staff?

Letter from the Enfield Society to the leader of Enfield Council, sent 26 June 2020

Councillor Nesil Caliskan
London Borough of Enfield Civic Centre
Silver Street
Enfield EN1 3XA

Dear Councillor Caliskan,

MUSEUM AND LOCAL STUDIES LIBRARY AND ARCHIVE

At our meeting on the 15th May we raised our concerns about the future of the Museum and the Local Studies Library and Archive. You were unable to provide us with any reassurance that a plan existed for these services when the space occupied on the first floor of the Dugdale Centre is taken over by the Children’s and Youth Services.

Since the meeting we have heard nothing more and continue to be extremely concerned about the fate of the Museum and Local Studies. It appears that plans to relocate the services are continuing apace without full consideration of the consequences of these moves and without any consultation with stakeholders in the borough.

We are aware that the decision to relocate the Children’s and Youth Service was agreed by Cabinet on 11th March this year. However, we feel that the decision did not give proper regard to the Council’s own strategy and planning. The Council’s Heritage Strategy and draft Local Plan, and the Report of the Enfield Town Study Group, all emphasise the importance of the Museum and the Local Studies Library and Archive in the Council’s plans for the Borough. We detail this in the Supporting Evidence attached.

Ii is hard to imagine how the ambitious but very worthwhile agenda set out in these documents can be delivered if the Museum and Local Studies are moved out of the first floor of the Dugdale Centre, unless similar space with comparable facilities can be provided in a central location. The remaining rooms on the ground floor of the Dugdale Centre are wholly inadequate for a display of the Museum’s permanent collection. Failure to provide adequate accommodation could result in a fragmented service across the borough—something which is particularly relevant when there is only one member of staff in Local Studies and one in the Museum.

Other salient points to consider:

• The museum and archive staff have worked hard to retain their accredited archive and museum status. We have a real fear that accredited status could be lost if the service is forced to move to inadequate premises. This would mean they would no longer be eligible for grants from the lottery or other bodies.
• The Museum of Enfield is the only accredited museum in the borough. It is hard to imagine how the museum and archive could promote itself and provide a service to users if no home for its permanent displays has even been identified.
• It is clear that considerable costs have already been incurred by the Council to set up the existing Museum and Local Studies Library and Archive. The archive store at the Dugdale was purpose built with reinforced floors to take the specialist custom built roller racking for storing books and documents. This store also has air conditioning controlled to 16^oC–18^oC in line with British Standard BS 5454. The permanent displays—the Enfield Life Gallery and People and Places Picture Gallery—were created on the first floor in 2012 with bandit proof glass cases and high quality Abloy locks. Replacing these facilities and the use of specialist removers for the Museum and Archive will incur considerable further expense. At a time of extreme pressure on Council finances the Society must ask if this is a wise use of public money.

Could you please now advise us of the plans for the future of the Local Studies Library and Archive and the Museum Gallery and what consultation will be offered to stakeholders before any decision is taken.

Yours sincerely,